WorkBC Center - Mission

If an individual has limited to no work experience, the organization can be of use. However, for experienced, educated individuals WorkBC doesn't offer anything of value. The employment counselor never listened and would just fob me off with the myriad of useless online courses (Career Connect) designed to make it look like they are actually doing something. The take away? Be your own advocate, do your own research and avoid these useless government contactors as they do not have the clients' interests at heart. These employment centers are a massive joke.

Great staff, very friendly, professional and take pride in helping every individual and their structured lives whom may come through their door's.

Wicked team of people

Friendly knowledgeable staff. Excellent place to link into and connect with helpful resources in the community . Not only will they help you find a job but there is a ton of programs and workshops you can sign up for to get certificates , training and skills to maintain a career

10/10Highly recommend for those who need help finding a job

CLOSED AT 3PM (OR RATHER 2:55PM SO STAFF CAN LEAVE AT 3) AFTER 1 HOUR CLOSED FOR LUNCH IS DUMB.NO ONE IS EVER IN THE CENTER FOR THIS AND MANY OTHER REASONS.

All the resources to enter back into the workforce. The Staff is awesome.

I'm a Security Training Instructor for the provincially mandated Security Training course. I went into the Mission WorkBC Centre to discuss coming in as a guest speaker to do a presentation on Security Training and industry standards.The commissionaire told me I need to wear a mask. I told them that I am exempt then they said they can't help me. I reminded them that I can't wear a mask and also reminded them that the mask mandate was taken down! I also pointed out to the staff and Security that they are violating my section 7 Charter Rights! Of course they responded that no they aren't!!REALLY?????The province repealed the Mask Mandates yet businesses are ignoring that fact as well as ignoring the LAW!!!!The actions of staff and the SG are extremely discriminatory which is a very serious human rights violation as well!!CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982In the words of the Right Hon. Brian Peckford, the last surviving First Minister who had a very big part in drafting and signing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (and is also a plaintiff in suing the current liberal govt for violating our Charter Rights):The Constitution Act, 1982. It is the supreme law of Canada, every piece of legislation, provincial and federal is subject to the constitution, province laws are subject to the Charter, every law, every health orders must not conflict with the constitution, health orders mean nothing unless it’s consistent with the Charter.Section 1, which provides the government with an override was meant for war or insurrection or if the country itself was in a dire state.It was not meant for a virus that has a 99% recovery rate or better. Before a government can infringe or violate our Charter (which is part of the Constitution) they must meet 4 tests (AKA: The Oakes Test):1). They have to demonstrably justify with data (facts, figures, arguments, studies, etc.) that these restrictions are necessary and there is no other recourse;2). To violate the Charter they must have parliament pass legislation that defends the need for imposed mandates;3). The mandates imposed must be within reasonably limits; and,4). Any and ALL mandates must be consistent with the values of a free and democratic society.Every individual Canadian has these Charter rights and freedoms. No other legislation has the power to overturn these rights and freedoms. Apparently all those holding political office need a re-education.FURTHER CASE LAWIn Canada, it is illegal for the govt, or anyone else to make vaccines (or any other medical treatment) mandatory. The following Canadian Case Law and numerous legislation supports this:PARMLEY v. PARMLEY & YULE (1945) SCC;HOPP v. LEPP (1980) 2 S.C.R.;R v. EWANCHUCK (1999) 1 S.C.R. (ALTHOUGH EWANCHUCK IS A CRIMINAL MATTER, THE COURTS DEFINED INFORMED CONSENT); alsoBENNAN v. PARSONNET 83 N.J.L. 20 (1912);Sections 6